Walter Rose Room, HVH
Wlater Rose Room, HVH
Bernard Hall, Cuddington
By Haddenham Webteam - 19th December 2016 3:00pm
Just as we were beginning to feel a little optimistic about the risk of a 5,000 home 'new settlement' going away, given AVDC's pushback against claims of an "unmet housing need" in South Bucks, the County Council has now waded in to resurrect the pressure on the Vale of Aylesbury.
On Monday 19th December, AVDC released this statement:
Bucks County Council (BCC) has objected to Chiltern and South Bucks' proposal to use areas of Green Belt for potentially over 2,800 houses. BCC has recommended the housing is moved elsewhere in the county and, as much of Wycombe is also covered by Green Belt, the most plausible place these houses can go is in Aylesbury Vale.
By cooperating with the other district councils, AVDC had recently reduced the level of housing the Vale would need to accommodate by 6,500 but BCC's proposal puts this work in jeopardy.
Aylesbury Vale District Council Leader, Cllr Neil Blake commented: "It's well documented that Aylesbury Vale is taking its fair share of the required housing growth for Bucks as a whole, and this announcement appears to set the precedent for sacrificing Aylesbury Vale to save the rest of the county. It's strange there was no similar objection from BCC to the Green Belt release for Wycombe's local plan. Surely this has nothing to do with the fact that BCC Leader Martin Tett lives in the area covered by the Chiltern/South Bucks Local Plan and there are county council elections next year.
The County Council is actually acting against a £100,000 report which it part funded. It contributed £20,000 to analyse potential usage of the Green Belt and accepted the findings, only to now reverse its opinion. Furthermore, this decision means BCC won't need the transport studies which it funded into the sites that it now no longer accepts."
Cllr Blake continued: "If this is an indication of how the county would be run were BCC to have complete control over planning matters, as detailed in its unitary plans, then we all have cause to be concerned. In the north/south two unitary divide proposed by the districts, local accountability and the capacity to fight unfair housing allocation such as this will be strengthened."
AVDC are now in discussion with the other district councils regarding this announcement and await the response of Chiltern and South Bucks to BCC's objections.
popular recent storiesAlso in the news
A group of a dozen volunteers made themselves available on Saturday 23rd October to help maintain Snakemoor nature reserve.Volunteer Manager Julian Watson summarised the achievements as follows:15 replacement bird boxes were installed across the reserve. These will be monitored from early spring to track which species take up residence;Approximately 2 tonnes of wood chippings have been...
The transfer of the lease for the Youth & Community Centre has been going through a rather protracted legal process for the last 18+ months, so that it can come under the control of the Junior School. This is unfortunate, given the modest number of good venues available for meetings and social gatherings in Haddenham. In the hope that this situation will be resolved soon, enquiries should be...
There was an unpleasant incident outside the Haddenham pharmacy on Tuesday when a man behaved aggressively towards the volunteer marshals.Writes Martin Andrew, Marshal Co-ordinator:"My shift leader had asked the man whether he had a mask as it was necessary for going into the pharmacy. He responded badly and said he would be reporting us (not sure to whom) and that we should have asked...